Restaurant Management Agreement
BACKGROUND
During the 1970's, the management contract
approach to operating hotels (covering hotel rooms and hotel
restaurants) gained widespread acceptance. Today, few national
hotel companies actually own the properties they
operate. Although the application of management
contracts to restaurants is still relatively new, the
fundamentals of the relationship are the same.
Under a management contract, an experienced operator will
take over a property (oftentimes distressed) and attempt to
make it profitable. If the operator is able to generate profit,
he retains a percentage of the profits for his efforts. The net
proceeds from operations are then passed through to the
owner.
The owner is motivated to accept the management contract
relationship for the following reasons:
- If the owner is also a restaurateur, he recognizes the
potential for greater profits - sometimes dramatically
higher than he would be able to achieve on his own
- He avoids the responsibilities and problems of daily
operations
- If the owner is not an operator, he recognizes his
inability to effectively hire and direct a manager
- His potential return is higher than if he merely leased
or subleased the restaurant to another operator
- If the operator improves profits substantially, the
resale value of the restaurant or value of the real estate
increases by healthy multiples
The restaurant management company is motivated to perform
well for the following reasons:
- The higher the profit generated for the
owner, the greater the reward to the operator
- The operator can expand
without the need to raise a large amount of investment
capital
- Success in
providing profits for the owner reinforces the operator's
credibility and ability to expand
Relationship Between Owner and
Operator
Most restaurants have two distinct components:
1. The Operating
Entity which derives revenues and incurs
expenses from the sale of food and beverage, and
2. The Real Estate
Entity which deals with the land, building,
improvements and such related aspects as debt service, property
taxes, building insurance and invested equity.
Management contract operators are concerned with the first
component and owners with the second.
Typically, an owner purchases the land, building, furniture,
fixtures and equipment, placing some cash down and financing
the balance over a period of time. On a regular basis he pays
interest and principal, property taxes, and premiums for
insurance on the building and its contents. From time to time
he makes capital improvements to the restaurant. The owner
regards his purchase of the property and the related expenses
of ownership as an investment. As such, he requires a
reasonable return on that investment.
The owner contracts with the operator to run the restaurant
business with the expectation the operator can generate
sufficient income from the restaurant to pay the costs of
operation, cover the owner's expenses of owning the property
and provide a reasonable return on investment.
Under a management agreement, the owner agrees to provide
working capital, bear all expenses, maintain insurance on the
building and contents, and avoid any role in the restaurant
operation. Among other things, the operator agrees to assume
proprietary responsibility for management, handle all
administrative functions, handle all cash, pay all bills,
develop and execute the marketing plan, design and price the
menu, plan capital improvement needs, select, train and
motivate staff, maintain accurate books and records, prepare
regular financial statements and prepare all sales and payroll
tax reports.
The essence of the relationship is that the operator is only
responsible for those revenues and expenses which pertain to
the actual operation of the restaurant and over which he has
control. If the operator is successful, he will generate income
from the operation after management fees which will then flow
to the owner.
Whether or not the income is sufficient to cover the owner's
expenses and expected return on investment is another matter.
Obviously, the operator has no control over how much the owner
paid for the property and thus cannot be accountable for the
adequacy of the income flow with respect to covering the
owner's real estate investment. It is in the operator's best
interests, however, to maximize profitability of the restaurant
which in turn maximizes cash flow to the owner.
Management Fee Formula
Generally, management companies are paid a percentage (2-5%)
of gross sales, called a Basic Management Fee (BMF) plus a
percentage of the operating income (15-25%) called an Incentive
Management Fee (IMF). The BMF covers the operators
organizational expenses and rewards him for increasing sales.
The IMF is the reward the operator receives for delivering
profits to the owner. Typically, IMF accounts for about 60% of
the fees received by a management company.
Pitfalls of Management
Contracts
Management contracts can create problems as well as solve
them. Listed below are a number of areas that can be potential
causes of dissatisfaction between owners and operators:
- owners do not understand the nature of the
relationship
- owners do not understand the terms of the contract
- owners attempt to interfere with the operation
- owners hesitate to make needed capital
improvements
- operators do not perform as well as anticipated
- operators pad their expenses to divert assets
- operators fail to perform needed maintenance in order
to increase short term profits
- operators fail to adequately promote the restaurant in
order to increase short term profits
- operators favor one of their operations over
another
As might be expected, there are occasionally disagreements
between owners and operators as to what constitutes operating
expenses as distinguished from ownership expenses. The best
solution lies in a clearly worded management agreement which
addresses these areas in detail and provides appropriate
incentives and safeguards to all parties. Ultimately, of
course, the real measure of "workability" in a management
contract is reflected in the level of respect and trust between
the owner and operator.
Profile of the Successful
Operator
The restaurant operator who succeeds in generating a stable,
consistently profitable operation generally shows the following
characteristics:
- is passionately and single-mindedly focused on guest
service
- thoroughly understands the aspects of the retail,
manufacturing and service industries
- has a significant vision, depth of knowledge and
technical competence
- demands tight controls and sound accounting
practices
- requires daily information to keep on top of the
operation
- responds with appropriate action in a timely
manner
- knows how to develop and implement restaurant marketing
plans
- is effective in the complex areas of staff training,
productivity and motivation
- takes a real delight in the professional development of
the restaurant's staff
- has high standards of quality and performance
- is able to deal effectively with a wide variety of
unexpected challenges
- is profit-oriented and willing to spend money to make
money
- maintains a perspective on the operation, its place
within the market and its potential for improvement
- genuinely enjoys the restaurant business
- is able to maintain a sense of humor and positive
attitude
Review the outline of a
Restaurant Management Agreement
Immediate download in Microsoft Word format -
$297
Immediate
download in WordPerfect format - $297
|